Date of Degree

2-2017

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Program

Political Science

Advisor(s)

Carol Gould

Committee Members

Rosalind P. Petchesky

Uday S. Mehta

Subject Categories

Ethics and Political Philosophy | Peace and Conflict Studies | Political Theory

Keywords

Atrocity, Moral Vision, Nationalism, Liberal Violence, Genocide, Evil

Abstract

All political communities set normative limits to the acceptable use of force. A threshold of atrocity indicates the point at which acceptable violence meets the boundaries of the unacceptable. In liberal democratic states such norms are ostensibly set higher. Hence, there is a theoretical threshold to the modern state’s ability to act in ways that violate norms it claims to uphold. Paradoxically, thresholds of atrocity are almost never breached and unconscionable violence occurs regularly. This study seeks to explain the persistence of extreme violence by developing a theory of atrocity grounded in moral vision. Liberal democratic nation-states are able to commit atrocities because they obscure these acts literally and metaphorically. Disguising violence in liberal democratic nation-states is further facilitated by the bureaucratic dispersion of responsibility characteristic of liberal nationalist ideology in particular, the conversion of liberal ideals into national myths, the mediation of moral information via a compliant news media system, and the adoption of technological means of violence that are inherently difficult to “see.” This raises an inescapable conclusion with radical normative implications: a great deal of the violence we presently tolerate as acceptable ought to instead be challenged as atrocious.

This work is embargoed and will be available for download on Thursday, January 10, 2019

Graduate Center users:
To read this work, log in to your GC ILL account and place a thesis request.

Non-GC Users:
See the GC’s lending policies to learn more.

Share

COinS