Date of Degree

9-2015

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Program

English

Advisor(s)

Sondra Perl

Subject Categories

Higher Education Administration | Rhetoric

Keywords

composition; data visualization; disciplinarity; dissertations; distant reading; topic modeling

Abstract

Combining qualitative coding with original algorithmic and quantitative analyses, this project aggregates and visualizes metadata from 2,711 recent doctoral dissertations in Composition/Rhetoric, completed between 2001 and 2010 (inclusive), in order to establish an empirical baseline of what new and established scholars in Composition/Rhetoric agree upon as acceptable research in the field. I find that both subject matter and methodologies largely collocate within a small number of clusters, but not without cross-over among these clusters, and I call for increased dialogue among schools focusing on these different methods and subjects.

Chapter 1, 'Disciplinary Anxiety and the Composition of Composition,' reviews the history of Composition/Rhetoric's search for a shared research paradigm, including its potential rejection of that goal. Following Derek Mueller (2009), I argue for 'distant reading' (Moretti), through metadata visualization, as a means of keeping abreast of research trends that would be unmanageable through direct reading alone.

Chapter 2, 'From Dissertations to Data: My Exhibits and My Methods,' explains how I obtained, selected, and prepared the 2,711 documents that go into my subsequent analysis.

Chapter 3, 'Mapping the Methods of Composition/Rhetoric Dissertations: A 'Landscape Plotted and Pieced,' ' takes up the question of whether the field has divided along methodological lines, as Stephen North (1987) predicted. After identifying methods used in dissertations based on their abstracts, I describe correlations between dissertation methods and the graduate schools where they are most frequently employed. Most dissertations used more than one method. I demonstrate that, while aggregable and empirical methods have not disappeared, few schools focus on them; dialectical and text-hermeneutic methods are far more common across the board.

Chapter 4, 'Tapping the Topics: What We Study When We Study Writing in Writing Studies,' turns from methods to content. Drawing on a computer-generated topic model of the full text of 1,754 dissertations, I provide evidence both for high-level clustering of topics and for large numbers of dissertations that cut across these clusters. The most common dissertation topics in this sample address the teaching of writing and, in a largely separate cluster, theories of meaning-making.

In Chapter 5, 'Toward a View From Everywhere: 'Disciplined Interdisciplinarity' and Distant Reading,' I reflect on the benefits and limitations of the methods I have used, and suggest directions for future study.

Although it is generally clear to doctoral students preparing to begin dissertation work that they have a number of methods to choose from, and a number of ways to construct and usefully constrain their subject matter, Composition/Rhetoric as a field has not generally speaking kept good track of trends across institutions, with the result that individual dissertation-writers do not know whether a particular method or subject they are considering is common or quirky, cutting-edge or passé. By offering a recent, zoomed-out view beyond the vantage point of any one program, these analyses provide a shared map of where Composition/Rhetoric doctoral research has been, so that researchers, thesis committees, and curriculum-planners can make more informed local decisions about where their research should go next.

 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.