Date of Degree

9-2016

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Program

Philosophy

Advisor(s)

Graham Priest

Committee Members

John Greenwood

Stephen Neale

David Rosenthal

Gary Ostertag

Subject Categories

Comparative Philosophy | Philosophy | Philosophy of Language | Philosophy of Mind

Keywords

meaning, holism, atomism, compositionality, pragmatics, semantics

Abstract

I defend semantic holism, the view that the meaning of an expression is determined by its relations to every other expression in the language of individual competent users. I argue that, once properly understood, most disadvantages attributed to holism can be dissolved and suggest that the core division between the holist and the non-holist is on the question whether invariant meanings shared across all possible occasions where the corresponded expressions are uttered are necessary for the explanation of meaning sharing. I give reason why the answer is negative and demonstrate how to explain our linguistic interaction without such invariant meanings.

 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.