Publications and Research

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2012

Abstract

Debates related to Muslim women’s dress, specifically, often pit religious freedom, individual liberty, and cultural rights against women’s rights and gender equality. Hélie's response to Yildirim (specifically her discussion of national and international legal responses to “headcoverings”) does not focus on legal aspects, but rather on gendered practices and their ideological roots.

Hélie adopts a global lens, recognizing that whilst historical and socio-political specificities are crucial to grasp the nuances of each context, questions related to dress codes in Muslim contexts nevertheless relate to issues affecting our world at large. Hélie discusses two main aspects of Yildirim's argument - namely: “headcoverings” as an expression of personal religious identity; and “headcoverings” with respect to tradition.

In order to assert that veiling cannot be apprehended solely as a private choice, Hélie considers the ways state and non-state actors promote veiling in various settings. Hélie's closing points reassert the need to distinguish “covered girls” from adults, and the risks inherent to defining the human rights framework and human rights values as a Western project.

Comments

This article was originally published in the Santa Clara Journal of International Law, available at http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol10/iss1/5

 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.