Date of Degree

2-2018

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Program

Criminal Justice

Advisor

Mark Fondacaro

Committee Members

Deborah Koetzle

Chongmin Na

William Heffernan

Christopher Slobogin

Subject Categories

Criminal Law | Criminology and Criminal Justice | Psychology

Keywords

Dual process theory, Free will, Need for cognition, Punishment, Public health, Drug policy

Abstract

A public health response to drug offenses has potential to improve both public safety and public health. However, the public’s desire for retribution represents a possible hindrance to reform. Relying on dual-process theory of moral decision-making, this dissertation examines agreement among laypeople about the relative blame deserved for various crime types, and probes several possible predictors of support—the need for cognition (“NFC”), intergroup bias, and free-will doubt—for retributive as well as consequentialist responses to crime. Findings from several web-based experiments show: (a) in comparison to core crimes (eg., murder) substantially less agreement about the relative blame deserved for noncore crimes (eg., drug offenses); (b) high NFC is associated with greater support for consequentialist responses to crime; and (c) free-will doubt is associated with less support for retribution, with blame mediating the relationship. Overall, it suggests high variability in decisions about noncore crimes, and possible ways to facilitate a switch in support from punishment to public health.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.