Date of Degree
Cognitive Psychology | Philosophy | Social and Behavioral Sciences
Cognitive science, Experimental philosophy, Metaethics, Metaphilosophy, Moral psychology, Neuroethics
This project addresses the question of why philosophical disputes persist, and tackles the problem of how we might better approach them. I demonstrate empirically several ways in which personality, gender, and other factors are associated with specific philosophical beliefs. Typically, one might assume that these individual difference factors are irrelevant to philosophy, and can only serve to bias philosophical disputants. Against this view, I present four case studies, which collectively highlight the different ways in which individual differences in lived experience may be inseparable from philosophical concepts themselves.
Holtzman, Geoffrey Scott, "Factlessness & Faultlessness: Individual Differences & Dimensions of Philosophical Dispute" (2014). CUNY Academic Works.
This work is embargoed and will be available for download on Monday, October 01, 2018
Graduate Center users:
To read this work, log in to your GC ILL account and place a thesis request.
See the GC’s lending policies to learn more.