Date of Degree
Herman Lee Bennett
Celtic Studies | Comparative Methodologies and Theories | Intellectual History | Legal | Medieval Studies | Renaissance Studies | Social and Cultural Anthropology
British Isles, British Empire, Arthurian Myth, Structuralism, Colonialism, Transatlantic Expansion
This dissertation studies the use of the Arthurian myth from the fifteenth through early seventeenth centuries, as a narrative that connected a set of political principles for the unification of Britain and its imperial expansion. Joining other competing political myths in the British archipelago, the political significance of the Arthurian myth has nevertheless been overlooked. On the one hand, the myth informed the transformations of kingship in England and Wales from the crowning of Edward IV to the early years of James’ English reign. It did so specifically within the process of institutionalizing a British crown which was intertwined with the claim of imperium. On the other hand, the myth also reinforced the assertion of possession over other peoples’ lands, including the whole of Britain, Ireland, and even different spaces in the north Atlantic. The Arthurian myth intertwined these two claims—of imperium and of possession—through two different competing narratives which connected the Crown of England with the history of ancient Britain. Furthermore, Arthurian literature and historiography represented an internal liminality within the British archipelago which Britain then projected to the North American shores. Transatlantic colonization not only was legitimized by supposed ancient conquests, including Arthur’s, but the American spaces and inhabitants, like the Irish before them, were codified in connection to an imagined British past, which began to be alienated from the present, or modern times. Working against traditional approaches to intellectual history of political thought and utilizing various perspectives that include literary analysis and neo-structuralism, this dissertation thus argues that the Arthurian myth was an important contributor to the emergence of an Anglocentric British imperial constitution by intertwining its legal, political, historical, philosophical, and poetical foundations.
Gonzalez de Leon Heiblum, Julian, "A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire
Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612)" (2022). CUNY Academic Works.
This work is embargoed and will be available for download on Thursday, February 01, 2024
Graduate Center users:
To read this work, log in to your GC ILL account and place a thesis request.
See the GC’s lending policies to learn more.
Celtic Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Legal Commons, Medieval Studies Commons, Renaissance Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons