Publications and Research
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2015
Abstract
Comments on an article by Jef Adriaenssens et al. (see record 2015-00662-015). In a recent review paper, Adriaenssens et al. concluded that about 26% of emergency nurses (EN) suffer from burnout and described their results as alarming. While commentators applaud Adriaenssens et al. efforts to provide a clearer picture of ill-health in EN, they thought that these authors' conclusions were weakened by a fundamental fact, namely, the absence of consensual, clinically valid diagnostic criteria for burnout. Trying to determine the prevalence of a condition that has no binding diagnostic criteria is problematic. Indeed, depending on how researchers decide to define (cases of) burnout, very different results can be obtained, and virtually any kind of conclusions can be drawn regarding the importance of the burnout phenomenon. Trying to determine the prevalence of a condition that has no binding diagnostic criteria is problematic. Indeed, depending on how researchers decide to define (cases of) burnout, very different results can be obtained, and virtually any kind of conclusions can be drawn regarding the importance of the burnout phenomenon.
Included in
Clinical Psychology Commons, Critical Care Nursing Commons, Health Psychology Commons, Psychiatry and Psychology Commons, Public Health Commons
Comments
This work was originally published in International Journal of Nursing Studies, available at doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.12.008.