Publications and Research
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-16-2016
Abstract
We consider a set-theoretic version of mereology based on the inclusion relation ⊆ and analyze how well it might serve as a foundation of mathematics. After establishing the non-definability of ∈ from ⊆, we identify the natural axioms for ⊆-based mereology, which constitute a finitely axiomatizable, complete, decidable theory. Ultimately, for these reasons, we conclude that this form of set-theoretic mereology cannot by itself serve as a foundation of mathematics. Meanwhile, augmented forms of set-theoretic mereology, such as that obtained by adding the singleton operator, are foundationally robust.
Comments
This article was originally published in Logic and Logical Philosophy, available at DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2016.007.
This work was distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial license (CC BY NC).