Date of Award

Spring 6-1-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

Department/Program

Forensic Mental Health Counseling

Language

English

First Advisor or Mentor

Mark Fondacaro

Second Reader

Charles Stone

Third Advisor

Evan Auguste

Abstract

Restorative Justice has been an emerging justice mechanism in the U.S. since the 1970s that advocates are working to expand more widely throughout the justice system. Due to victims and the broader community of the offender being an integral part of the Restorative Justice process, it is critical to consider the general public's support of this novel justice mechanism, as well as the influence that social biases among the public may have on the experience of defendants going through the system. The study conducted examined the effect that social biases toward an offender's personal characteristics have on attitudes and opinions toward the offender, the crime committed, and the utilization of Restorative Justice as an alternative to traditional justice methods. To measure this relationship, we employed a factorial design to investigate the effects of three main characteristics—race, socioeconomic status, and mental health status of the offender—and their impact on participants' willingness to utilize restorative practices. We expected that offenders with such characteristics would be perceived more negatively and their crimes rated as more severe—particularly when multiple stigmatizing traits are present. We further hypothesized that these perceptions would mediate the relationship between offender characteristics and recommendations for restorative justice. Results found that over 50% of participants recommended a combination of restorative and traditional justice methods. Contrary to expectations, stigmatizing characteristics increased rather than decreased willingness to recommend restorative justice. Perception mediated the relationship between offender characteristics and justice recommendations, and restorative justice attitudes were a significant predictor across all analyses. These findings suggest that bias influences willingness to employ restorative justice and that the presence of stigmatizing characteristics may alter how stigma is processed, rendering individuals less punitive when alternative options are available.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.