Date of Award

Spring 6-1-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department/Program

Forensic Science

Language

English

First Advisor or Mentor

Peter Diaczuk

Second Reader

Jack Hietpas

Third Advisor

Andrew Winter

Abstract

Bloodstain detection can provide valuable information on the ability of presumptive tests. When perpetrators seek to alter the scene of violent crimes to interfere with investigations or flee from justice, crime scene investigation becomes more complex. In this analysis, scenarios where bloodstain evidence is attempted to be removed by household cleaners and covered up by acrylic or oil-based paint, are tested using luminol and Kastle-Meyer direct testing. These bloodstains have been altered by bleach, dish soap or all-purpose cleaner and covered under multiple layers of acrylic or oil-based paint. Evidence is documented both photographically and visually to simulate crime scene investigation and focuses on layers of paint as the main avenue of reducing visibility. A positive result is determined by the ability to be visually and photographically seen within the acceptable timeframe of reference for these presumptive tests. The study concluded that bloodstains covered by oil-based paint are less effectively hidden than bloodstains covered by acrylic paint when presumptive testing is applied by the two-step method.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.