Abstract
Navigating confusing peer-review structures in publishing can be daunting for librarians at all stages of their career. In this paper, the authors will differentiate peer-review models and reflect on their experiences with these formats in the context of the [redacted] special issue of [redacted]. Additional discussion will include the hidden curriculum of publishing; areas for growth in peer-review related to diversity, equity, and inclusion; and peer-review as an individual and collective form of professional development that shapes how we engage with scholarship in LIS.
Recommended Citation
Lacey, S., Clement, K., Nataraj, L., & Pagowsky, N. (2023). Making Publishing Less Painful: Shifting to a Relational Peer-Review Process. Urban Library Journal, 29 (2). Retrieved from https://academicworks.cuny.edu/ulj/vol29/iss2/2
Included in
Information Literacy Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, Scholarly Publishing Commons