Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects
Date of Degree
6-2025
Document Type
Master's Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts
Program
Women's and Gender Studies
Advisor
Red Washburn
Subject Categories
History of Science, Technology, and Medicine | Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies | Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies | Queer Studies | Women's Studies
Keywords
asexuality, desire, sexuality studies, sexology, archives
Abstract
Asexuality became widely known in 2001 when David Jay, launched the Asexuality, Visibility and Education Network (AVEN), however, it’s been just throughout the last decade that it has gained popularity among LGBTQ studies. This thesis explores asexuality beyond its conventional framing as a sexual orientation, positioning it instead as a theoretical framework with the potential to challenge hegemonic understandings of sexuality. It does so by tracing the historical construction of sexual desire through the discipline of sexology, demonstrating how its discourses helped reinforce compulsory sexuality—the expectation that individuals must experience and act upon sexual desire (Emens 2014). Building upon this concept, this work introduces the notion of compulsory desire, to emphasize how contemporary hegemonic notions of sexuality are assembled under the idea that sex is fundamental for a “healthy,” fulfilled, happy human life. Drawing on queer historiography and asexuality studies, this work provides a blueprint to set up an asexual counter-archive that reinvents and reimagines popular understandings of desire, to liberate sex, intimacy, and subjecthood from dominant sexual paradigms. In doing so, it discusses three texts that can serve as pillars for such an archive but ultimately argues that, because of the fantastical dimension of desire, it will never be possible to reduce it to a single definition. This work vindicates embracing asexuality as a lens for critical self-inquiry and a rethinking of erotic and affective possibilities which can foster alternative narratives of intimacy that resist heteronormative and patriarchal rationales.
Recommended Citation
Martinez Martinez, Amaranta, "Re/Inventing Desire: Asexuality as a Tool for Utopian Intimacies" (2025). CUNY Academic Works.
https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/6225
Included in
History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons, Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Queer Studies Commons, Women's Studies Commons
